Post image for <i>Doctor Who</i> 5.05: “Flesh and Stone”

Doctor Who 5.05: “Flesh and Stone”

by Rob on May 1, 2010

Note: The following review contains spoilers for all aired episodes of Doctor Who, including the most recent, “Flesh and Stone.”

Before watching the latest Doctor Who episode, Flesh and Stone, I rewatched the first in this two-parter, The Time of Angels, thinking that seeing it all as one piece might help make it easier to review.  I was wrong.  Instead, I left this ingenious episode (the best of the series, to date) just as bewildered, overwhelmed, and awestruck as I might have been had this been my first exposure to the Doctor.  Steven Moffat built this mindshattering mini-serial around a staggering red herring, namely the Weeping Angels–the silent assassins, the terrifying creatures of nightmare who only move once they’re out of your field of vision (reminiscent of the hidden door in Amy’s house that could only be seen out of the corner of your eye)–making it seem that the episode was building to this prophesied moment, The Time of Angels, when the world would be destroyed by these ideas turned flesh (and stone)…And then he pulled the rug out from under us and turned the story upside down. Literally.

At the end of last week’s episode, the Doctor surprised us all by shooting out the lights and telling everybody to jump.  The moment this episode begins, we learn his real plan.  By shooting the gravity ball, he may have eliminated the light, but he also created a new gravity field in mid-air, so that when everyone jumps, they then fell upwards onto the ship above them.  This is just the first of many times in this episode that so-called truths we think we know (such as up is up and down is down) are flipped on their heads.  Another major one is that the only way to defeat the Weeping Angels is to always keep your eyes opened.  Amy, however, finds herself in the opposite situation.  To wit, just like the skip in the tape in the previous episode, the Angel in her eye can only exist as long as its image exists.  When the tape skipped, the tape, for that short moment, ceased to be an Angel.  When Amy’s eyes are closed, they cease to hold the image of the Angel, as well, and so to prevent herself from being destroyed by the Angel within her, she must make sure she never opens them.

This naturally leads to one of the tensest, most nailbitingly suspenseful scenes in new Who history, as Amy makes her way through the fairy tale forest–and wearing red, like a certain famous fairy tale character with a preference for hooded capes, no less–while surrounded by metaphorical wolves.  She can’t open her eyes, nor can she let the monsters know that they are closed.  The episode then gives us a glimpse of something we never thought we’d see: the Angels moving.  And there are two additional examples here of flipped realities: (1) the fact that there is a fairy tale forest within a spaceship, and (2) the brilliant concept of “treeborgs.”  All of these nuances further reinforce the fairy tale motif that Moffat has woven throughout the series to date, referenced once more by River Song in her final scene of the episode.  She tells the Doctor that they will see each other again “when the Pandorica opens.”  When the Doctor responds that that’s only a fairy tale, she laughs and responds, in a most meta manner, “Oh, Doctor, aren’t we all?”

River Song is revealed to not be all that she originally seemed to be, either.  Up to this point, we had assumed that she was an ally of the Doctor’s, but now, that is not so clear.  We learn that she has committed a murder of a very good man and can only assume at this point that this mysterious person she is supposed to have killed is the Doctor himself.  Speaking of being flipped upside down, River Song is the show’s strongest living embodiment of the timey wimeyness that Moffat loves so much.  Like the Doctor, she lives outside of linear chronology, so traditional definitions of past, present, and future become wholly irrelevant.  We know from Forest of the Dead that at some point in her future, she will “die” with the Doctor by her side, a version of the Doctor, however, who is chronologically younger than the one she meets in this episode (although Eleven looks physically younger, he is, of course, older than Ten by dint of having come after him), which takes place after she has presumably killed a further future version of the Doctor in her own past.  Say that ten times fast.  River leaves us with many questions in this episode: Did she murder the Doctor?  If so, did she do it for a noble reason, or is she an enemy?  If the former, is it possible that the Doctor simply faked his death or they were involved in a plan together to fake his death, for some as-of-yet unknown purpose?  And perhaps most importantly, if she did actually kill the Doctor, can this be rewritten?

The reappearance of the Crack of Doom is the episode’s ultimate example of turning the show on its head.  The image of all the Angels being sucked into the Crack is a truly sobering one.  Time for the Doctor has always been mutable to a small degree, and yet there have always been crucial, fixed points that could never be changed.  The Crack, however, flies in the face of all that he thought he knew, for it seems to be erasing vast swathes of history, as if they had never occurred.  And when the Crack is done with them, they didn’t.  The Doctor tells Amy that she has to risk her life in the forest, because far worse than being killed by the Angels would be for the Crack to annul the very fact that she ever existed at all.  This leads to a fascinating philosophical question regarding whether this erasing of history should be viewed as a fully pessimistic possibility.  On the one hand, the idea of being eliminated from history is rather terrifying.  On the other, however, it allows for change to occur, potentially positive change, such as the opportunity for the Doctor to perhaps avoid his murder, if that indeed is what River did.  The Crack also, of course, saves our protagonists from the Weeping Angels.  It would be hard to argue that such a destructive force will actually be seen as a good thing, but I could certainly see how its potentially advantageous side effects could tempt the Doctor.  If utilized correctly, all the sins of his past could be wiped clean away.  Tabula rasa.

We are also left to wonder what exactly caused the Crack, and how and if it is actually connected to Amy in any more significant a manner than the fact that it appeared in her bedroom.  The Doctor makes reference to the Cyberking in Victorian London which seemed to have no later impact on history.  How could Amy have been to blame for that?  Perhaps her connection to the Crack causes some ripple effect with people she meets and places they have been?  And what of the probable explosion that the Doctor says caused it?  Could this actually be his fault, the result of the TARDIS’ explosion and collision at the end of The End of Time?  At the same time, the Doctor seems to be convinced that he should be able to solve this problem by getting Amy to do…something that we don’t quite know yet.  Does he actually believe this or is he trying to avoid considering his own potential culpability in the Crack?  And my next question, why isn’t it next week yet?

Of course, I can’t end this review without discussing the final world-turned-upside-down moment of this episode–Amy jumping the Doctor.  In the past, we have seen the coy flirtations between the Doctor and Rose, as well as Martha’s pining for him.  Amy, however, decides not to dance around the subject.  She is the first companion to just skip the subtext and throw herself at him, not because she has some deep, all-consuming love for him, but just…because.  Because they have adventures together and because the thrill of it turns her on and because she is avoiding her wedding and all the responsibilities that go with it.  It is rather fascinating, from a character perspective, how Amy’s time with the Doctor really does seem to be about putting the pause button on the path that her life seemed to be taking and indulging in the dreams of her childhood before having to return to her “real life.”

My final question, then, is whether it is possible that the Crack manifests based on Amy’s moods?  The Crack could be seen as the ultimate symbol of avoidance.  Why, it erases all unpleasantness all together–along with everything else, which is what makes it so destructive.  In Victory of the Daleks, Bracewell ceased to be a bomb, because the Doctor and Amy reconnected him with his humanity.  If Amy, in running away, is indirectly controlling the Crack, is it possible that the Doctor feels that reconnecting her with her fiance (who we finally learn is Rory), reminding her of her love for him, will be what can seal the rift?  Again, I reiterate, next episode, please!

PS 5/3/10 Sometimes my friends are very, very smart.  My friend, Keith, noticed something about the episode that I completely missed. When the Doctor leaves Amy in the woods, he tells her that he always comes back, dashes off, and then comes right back a second later to say more.  When he comes back, though, he is wearing his jacket–the jacket he lost with the Weeping Angels–and which he isn’t wearing at any other later point in the episode.  From that, Keith spins a brilliant theory that, upon rewatching the scene, completely works: “It’s clear to me that the Doctor – a future version of Eleven – is jumping back through time to fix something terrible that has gone wrong. He reappears for a moment in this episode in a manner that is notable but surprising; plus Amy’s got her eyes shut, so she can’t see that he’s wearing a jacket that the Weeping Angels already stole from him earlier.

“And then he talks to her about what he told her when she was seven… and I’m convinced that’s a direct reference to him returning to Amy in that brief glimpse we had of young Amelia still waiting at the end of “The Eleventh Hour” – a moment that could have been a dream, but always could have been something much bigger. It’s much bigger!” To read his full, brilliant review, click here.

All Doctor Who Reviews

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

CarpeDylan May 1, 2010 at 5:45 pm

I'm gonna be honest here; there were several points throughout this episode where I had to pause the whole thing because it was getting too much for my fragile little mind. The most notable of which was when the Doctor referenced 'The Next Doctor'. I had already accepted long ago that Rusty had just decided to let a throwaway line in The Planet Of The Dead ("What was your favourite? The giant robot?" [though this could've been a reference to the Fourth Doctor's first serial 'Robot']) cover the Cyberking's appearance and let that be the (unfulfilling) end of it. Then, out of nowhere, the single-most continuity-free episode there's ever been is tied in with one of the (so far) cleverest continuity arc ever.

It was at that point I had to pause and childishly squeal "OH MY GOD. OH MY GOD." repeatedly into my pillow (though not before posting the same to Twitter.) Just the fact that it was given a solid reference makes me like 'The Next Doctor' more now (which is good, because now I can't pretend it's not canon.)

But yes, the entire story absolutely blew my mind out the window and left me flabbergasted. Think about how warm and cuddly you felt after watching the latest episode of Glee. Now multiply it by 1000 and replace it was complete awe. That's how I feel right now. Angels, Cracks, Pandoricas, Daleks, Cyberkings, sex, wibbly-wobbly timey-what-the-hell-is-happening-wimey, and 51-days-from-now-everything-apparently-goes-to-hell. It's too much.

There were so many fantastic moments in this episode, and so many chances for insane speculation. I'm gonna start now by guessing that the Doctor means to stop River from dying. "Doctor, what are you thinking?" "That time can be rewritten." ->Forest Of The Dead-> "River, time can be rewritten!" "Not that time, don't you dare. Not one line."

Also, slutty!Amy is awesome. "Amy, quite possibly the single most important thing in the history of the universe is that I get you sorted out right now!" "That's what I've been trying to tell you!"

The only bad thing to come from this story is how much next week's episode will suffer by comparison. if it's not done well, it'll be like, well, travelling with the Doctor and then going back to normal life, and I'm not ready to go home yet.

Reply

crossoverman May 1, 2010 at 6:51 pm

Also, the line: "Handcuffs! Does it always have to end this way?" And she has no way of knowing, that's how it does end for her! With the Doctor in handcuffs, unable to stop her. BRILLIANT.

Reply

TGR Worzel May 2, 2010 at 2:03 am

Seeing the Angels moving was scary, but completely inconsistent with what we had been told previously in "Blink". They're supposed to be "faster than you know". And as I said on your last reveiew, the Angels are supposed to displace you to a different point in time, not break your neck…

I'd missed the analogy to little Red Riding Hood, which is an interesting observation Rob. I didn't look at it that deeply and thus thought that this weeks plot was weak and very disappointing. There was a very convenient teleport when Moffat had otherwise run out of ideas and that reversing gravity idea was another act of desperation in the midst of a cliffhanger. How did they all seem to land on their feet, on the ceiling in the positions they'd been standing when they jumped, they'd be sprawled in a big heap with arms and legs everywhere wouldn't they…?

As for the sex stuff, I've blogged about that at http://tgrworzels.blogspot.com/2010/05/you-cant-s

We'll probably find out that River is the Drs biological daughter, later in the series,

if River is going back through her past and the Dr/Amy are going forward through their future…

Perhaps Amy's crack does need to annul her very existence, because of that mind-blowing complication…

And maybe I will tune in again next week, after all…

Reply

TGRWorzel May 2, 2010 at 2:16 am

Actually. regarding crossoverman's comment about handcuffs. Didn't the Dr's first encounter with Amy start with some handcuffs…?

That does seem to tie up with what I said above. I'm sure there's some sort of biological/genetic connection somewhere, that needs to be undone as it'll cause the end of the universe…

And we mustn't forget that the Dr has already had a daughter, via cloning. Whatever happened to her. Jenny, wasn't it…?

Reply

Rob May 2, 2010 at 5:42 am

"Seeing the Angels moving was scary, but completely inconsistent with what we had been told previously in “Blink”. They’re supposed to be “faster than you know”. And as I said on your last reveiew, the Angels are supposed to displace you to a different point in time, not break your neck…"

In the previous episode, the Doctor said that the Angels were "ideas" that came alive. Ideas evolve and change, which is also a meta commentary on writing itself. Furthermore, a point was made that the last Angels we saw were a few scavengers, while these Angels are an army, with a different agenda. Perhaps they're getting enough power from the ship to heal themselves and so don't need to displace people for strength. Killing the people–wasting food–could be a deliberate statement on their part. Either way, the brilliance of the episode to me is that an answer isn't required, because the Angels don't end up being the Big Bad after all. In fact, by the end of the episode, these Angels never existed.

"There was a very convenient teleport when Moffat had otherwise run out of ideas and that reversing gravity idea was another act of desperation in the midst of a cliffhanger. How did they all seem to land on their feet, on the ceiling in the positions they’d been standing when they jumped, they’d be sprawled in a big heap with arms and legs everywhere wouldn’t they…?"

As to the first, yes, it was convenient. And I don't have any problem with that, particularly because of how brilliantly it reversed Amy and the Angels' position. She disappeared from their sight, just as they often disappear from others' sight. It's also another example of the show being flipped on its head, because we didn't know there was a teleport device there. Further, the Doctor many times in the past has found broken equipment and fixed it to get them out of a jam. This time River did the same thing. Another flip.

As to the second, this is "Doctor Who," which has never been about perfect science. It's about a space man who travels around in a little blue box that's bigger on the inside! I would gladly sacrifice any realism (or as much as you can expect from a show that just created a reverse gravity field on a room's ceiling, so to speak) for that fantastic trick shot, which also set up so many of this episode's intricate themes and plot points. Sure, they could have been in a heap, but (1) we would have lost that clever visual pun and (2) it wasn't necessary. They jumped in place, and then the gravity reoriented, turned them all around and landed them on their feet, as they would had had they been allowed to land on the ground that they jumped from. It makes "Doctor Who" sense, and since this is "Doctor Who," that's good enough for me.

Reply

Rob May 2, 2010 at 5:43 am

"We’ll probably find out that River is the Drs biological daughter, later in the series…"

Hmm, I don't think most daughters refer to their dads as "Sweetie"…

Reply

JR Stone May 2, 2010 at 7:01 am

Love the review Rob! Gave me more to think about in regards to the episode and its themes. I missed the Red Riding Hood reference too (Facepalm).

I'm not sure that River will figure any further this season. Just like the Library episodes, Moffat loves to tease with possible future stories. It's like leaving cliffhangers while still giving us satisfying closure on the actual episode.

Loving this season so far!

Reply

Mike (@tazz602) May 2, 2010 at 9:21 pm

I need to re-watch all the episodes. Like CarpeDylan, my little human mind was also spinning out of control and doing contortions that are not possible. Remember a Timelord consciousness cannot be contained in a human mind and Moffat is doing his best to make us look at the screen, reverse, play it again and still not put two and two together and get 42.

The crack – I know we have not seen the last of it, and I what I got out of his mentioning the Cyber-King and other events that seemed to never make it to history books was a suggestion that the crack has always been there and always following him, cleaning up and erasing things from history that should never have been. (Like Amy not remembering the Daleks) In the first episode, the jail warden, I think it was, seemed surprised that the Doctor did not know the origin of the crack and acted like he should. Now what the connection of the crack is to Amy? I think you may be onto something about it being connected to her somehow, maybe emotionally, also keep in mind that the TARDIS was having some issues landing at the correct time when Amy came into his life. I have a feeling that the Doctor is on that same track in solving the riddle of the crack and will be the reason Rory is brought along next week for the ride.

River. Moffat blew all of my ideas to smithereens. But notice that again (or actually for the first time), River was willing to give her life to save the Doctor as she did in The Library. The foreshadowing was hitting us over the head about what River did (or will do), but in true Who fashion I'm sure we'll be surprised when the truth is revealed.

As to the convenience of the teleport and jumping, yes, convenient, but also isn't that a signature Doctor plot device. When all else fails, when there is no possible way, the Doctor pulls something from his sleeve that he was holding back, that he never told anyone, and that he knew all along he would have to do. But I agree – they should have been all sprawled out (on the ceiling) when the lights came back on, I thought the exact same thing.

Great review and I loved the Red Riding Hood allegory. Brilliant.

Reply

Rob May 3, 2010 at 5:35 am

Heh, I still think that moment would be infinitely less cool if there weren't the momentary confusion of where they could possibly be and why they look exactly as they did a moment before. Love your comment, tho! Especially the 42 reference. ;)

What's most awesome about this all to me is that it gives us the indication that when this season is over, we will be able to look back on it as one very large, intricate Moffat puzzle, and even the earlier episodes that seemed less classically Moffaty only seemed so because they are pieces of this larger puzzle.

Reply

ricpye May 4, 2010 at 12:39 am

…look again: they ARE all sprawled on the ceiling, save the doctor and even he's unsteady on his feet. They're all just getting to their feet as the camera pulls out to reveal their new whereabouts.

As to the new killing mode for the Angels: in ep 4 the Doctor queried it, saying maybe they need the bodies for something – and that thing is communication (by stripping and reanimating the cerebral cortex, according to 'Bob'). Remember, there's initially only the one Angel at killing strength. In 'Blink' they'd surround you so you couldn't watch them all at the same time. The one Angel can't do that, but can use the voice of each dead Cleric to call the next into his trap.

crossoverman's observation about the jacket is huge: there was something odd about the way the Doctor returned in that moment – an odd change in the pace: for it to be an out-of-time version is an awesome prospect, and resolves the oddness rather grandly.

Here's another thought: in the Eleventh Hour, the multi-form taunted the Doctor about the origin of the 'cracks in the skin of the universe', saying 'The Doctor in the TARDIS doesn't know.' When Angel Bob was talking about the power in the ship, he said 'The Doctor in the TARDIS hasn't noticed' – same form of words. I have no idea how these aliens know anything about the TARDIS in the first place, but I think there's something in the choice of words. Is there another Doctor, not 'in the TARDIS' trying to fix things? Or are they taunting the Doctor, knowing that he and the TARDIS had something to do with causing the cracks in the first (or quite possibly the last) place?

If you want to think about another tiny possible wardrobe hint: I never thought the video message Amy left for herself in 'The Beast Below' was satisfactorily explained – when did she record it? Was it done during the time she forgot, or is something else going on? If you watch it again, in the video recording the top button of her nightie is firmly done up. In the rest of the episode – before and after – it's undone. I wonder if there's also a parallel Amy running about… Or, you know, minor continuity error ;-)

Um, I'm sure I'm overthinking things! Anyway – great reviews – look forward to them every week. And great to have another place to on the 'net to rant about these things!

Reply

Loren Rosson III May 4, 2010 at 2:41 am

TGR Worzel wrote:

Seeing the Angels moving was scary, but completely inconsistent with what we had been told previously in Blink. They’re supposed to be faster than you know. And…the Angels are supposed to displace you to a different point in time, not break your neck.

Rob responded:

In the previous episode, the Doctor said that the Angels were 'ideas' that came alive. Ideas evolve and change, which is also a meta commentary on writing itself. Furthermore, a point was made that the last Angels we saw were a few scavengers, while these Angels are an army, with a different agenda. Perhaps they’re getting enough power from the ship to heal themselves and so don’t need to displace people for strength. Killing the people–wasting food–could be a deliberate statement on their part.

Or as I prefer to think, a mark of sadism. Remember when the Doctor asks the angels why they're tormenting Amy, and they respond (through the mannerisms of Soldier Bob) "for the fun of it, sir".

I don't object to the angels turning into neck-breakers. It adds a vicious element to them that trumps their need to feed. But I do have a problem with Amy being able to fake the fact that she can see while surrounded by a horde of the creatures. (If they can be fooled this way, they're pretty stupid, and she takes a long time to start moving anyway: the Doctor has to keep barking at her to start walking.) And I agree with Worzel that showing the angels moving sluggishly as stone creatures was a mistake.

Other than that, however, I was greatly pleased by this double-bill, and for the first time in ages I got almost exactly what I wanted out of a Doctor Who story. I much enjoyed Amy's attempt to rape the Doctor. It was shocking in a good way and believable, just as his reaction was. My full thoughts here.

Reply

Dawn May 17, 2010 at 1:48 pm

I so need someone to talk to about The Doctor. I'm driving my mother crazy trying to explain things about a show she cares nothing about. Once again. Loved the review. I watched this episode just last night, and I was shaking in my boots as Amy tried to walk through those angels. And when THEY MOVED, I so wanted to squeak, but the rest of the house was asleep as it was 4 a.m. However, I couldn't muffle my exclamation when Amy jumped on The Doctor! Reading your reviews after watching makes them so much more enjoyable. Thank you.

Reply

Beka June 5, 2010 at 3:02 pm

Okay, I definitely have to leave a comment to the addendum, and your friend's snippet – HE IS NOT THE ONLY PERSON TO HAVE THAT THEORY! My girlfriend noticed the same thing and came up with the SAME EXACT THEORY about a week after the episode aired, when she noticed the Doctor was wearing his coat. There are, if you listen closely to parts of other episodes, moments when you can hear something that sounds like the TARDIS, when the Doctor is clearly doing something that is NOT flying her around willy-nilly. She ALSO pointed out another moment that might've been evidence of the Doctor popping back to fix something – in Victory of the Daleks, during the blackout, that old soldier at his post notices a light and says "turn that light out". It goes out. England's been at war for a LONG time now – what soldier would've made the mistake of opening a door to the outside, or turning a light on? Also, if you listen very closely after the light goes out, you can hear something that might be a very faint TARDIS sound. It's hard to tell if we're imagining it or not, because it IS quiet, but other people have noticed it too, independent of us. It definitely bears thought…

Reply

Fax Paladin June 7, 2010 at 1:58 am

Consider also: Not only does Amy have her eyes closed, but the other soldiers *are looking away.* The Doctor is talking quietly at that point so as not to be discovered.

Also, you wouldn’t necessarily hear the TARDIS — River Song having just demonstrated in Part One that it’s possible to land the TARDIS silently…

Reply

Leave a Comment

 

Previous post:

Next post: