Note: The following review contains spoilers for all aired episodes of Doctor Who, including the most recent, “Vincent and the Doctor.”
“Vincent and the Doctor” is an absolutely lovely episode of Doctor Who–simple, kind, and bittersweet–featuring an extremely moving performance by Tony Curran as the greatest painter to ever live and an uncredited cameo by the great Bill Nighy as a museum curator. What it lacks in plotting complexity, it makes up for in characterization and sheer artistry. For example, the scene in which Amy and the Doctor lie on the ground in a circle with Van Gogh and look up at the sky, in order to discover the colors and patterns that make up the world that otherwise only he can see, their shared view bursting into the dazzling colors and swirls of “Starry Night,” is one of the most profound and beautiful moments in the new series’ history, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this were true for the entire span of Doctor Who. Meanwhile, the sets, which recreate landmarks of Van Gogh’s life depicted in some of his most famous paintings, are lovingly detailed and beautifully executed.
On the surface, the plot is fairly straightforward. In a Van Gogh painting of a church, the Doctor notices a monster that isn’t supposed to be there, so the Doctor and Amy travel to the final year of Van Gogh’s life, in order to discover what caused this creature to appear. The Doctor enlists Van Gogh’s help, and they solve the problem. As I said, relatively simple. There is, however, much more underneath the surface. A haze of sadness overhangs the episode, even in its lighter moments, because we know that in less than a few handfuls of months, Van Gogh will succumb to madness and take his life at the age of 37, having only ever sold one painting and having no clue what a genius he is. When we watch him treat the currently world-famous paintings that clutter his apartment as if they are trash, setting his coffee cup on one, and hastily slapping white paint over another in order to sketch the monster he saw, we instinctually wince and feel deep sorrow for a man who died thinking he was a failure, never knowing that the world would one day come to consider his practically revolutionary paintings to be world-class masterpieces.
Vincent is someone who sees the world as no one else can, who sees rare, hidden beauty in what others think to be commonplace, who many have labelled a madman due to his unique vision (represented both literally and metaphorically here), and who longs for companionship. In many ways, he is a great deal like the Doctor. It is a credit to both Curran’s delicate performance, as well as to Curtis’ delicate writing, that Vincent emerges as both a three-dimensional, exquisitely portrayed character in his own right, as well as a great thematic parallel to the Doctor. Also, like the Doctor, he can perceive that something is wrong with Amy on an emotional level, that she has experienced a great loss and doesn’t even realize it. Vincent and the Doctor are the rare people who can see beneath the facade of the world to what is obscured from everyday sight.
This concept of sight vs blindness recurs throughout the episode. Amy is blind to her own history and nature, having forgotten Rory and the fact that, if only for a short time, she wanted to marry someone (and, again, one has to wonder what Amy’s new version of her own memories, at this point, is). The people who surround Van Gogh in his day-to-day life are blind to his talent. Van Gogh is blind to his own worth. Everyone but Van Gogh, the Doctor, and Amy is blind to the existence of the creature. Even the Doctor and Amy are technically blind to the creature, not being able to see him. And, in a sad but fitting additional layer, the creature itself is blind, in both senses of the word. It has either lost its eyesight or never had it to begin with, but either way, having been abandoned in a foreign environment, it is alone and scared (like Vincent, and like the Doctor, to some extent), its violent actions the result of panic and fear, not intentional cruelty.
Vincent and the Doctor discover the poor creature’s true nature too late. In the end, however, the Doctor decides that it’s not too late to make a difference in Van Gogh’s life. The Doctor takes Van Gogh into the TARDIS, accurately realizing that if anyone in history could deal with being confronted with a machine that calls all common sense and understandable science into question and turns the established rules of the universe, or at least as humans have come to believe it, topsy turvy, it is Vincent Van Gogh. In a truly gorgeous scene, the Doctor and Amy lead Vincent into the Van Gogh gallery in which the episode began and show him what an enormous impact he will have after his death.
Since the episode has finished airing less than three hours ago, I have already read a negative review that claims it to be “nonsensical” that Vincent could ever be believed to have still committed suicide after being taken on this voyage by the Doctor, an attitude which utterly misunderstands and disregards one of this episode’s main points. As the Doctor tells the heartbroken Amy, “The way I see it, every life is a pile of good things and bad things…The good things don’t always soften the bad things, but vice versa, the bad things don’t necessarily spoil the good things or make them unimportant. And we definitely added to his pile of good things.” It is naive to expect that someone suffering from deep depression and/or other psychological disorders–of which the episode clearly depicted Van Gogh as being a victim–could be instantly cured, even by the Doctor. We have no way to see or to truly understand what is going on inside Van Gogh’s head, and so it’s impossible to say why he finally commits suicide, and the same could be said for anyone suffering similarly. That does not mean that, in showing Vincent that his life has enormous worth, that the Doctor and Amy did not have a profound effect on him. Without them, he may never have come to have the most prolific year of his–or, as the episode argues, any–artist’s career. They seem to have inspired this burst of unparalleled creativity in him. His end remaining sad does not negate the great beauty and joy he brought to the world.
Throughout the episode, the Doctor is worried that his actions might accidentally wipe out the existence of some of the greatest artwork to ever be put to canvas, a concern that mirrors the effect of the Crack that has been practically stalking him throughout the season. Therefore, the gallery full of Van Gogh paintings at the end (as well as a new dedication on one, to Amy) can be seen as nothing short of a triumph, as well as perhaps an indication that the universe isn’t doomed. After all, the Crack hasn’t caught up with the Doctor yet.
“Vincent and the Doctor” is reflective of Van Gogh’s artwork. Like an Impressionist painting, it deliberately avoids filling in and explaining every single detail–for example, we never learn why Van Gogh commits suicide or a scientific (or even quasi-scientific) reason for why he can see the creature. Instead, it uses thematic nuance to hint at the characters’ complex emotions, woven throughout an installment of Doctor Who that is far more about the impressions with which it leaves us than such technical concerns as plot.







































{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }
And thank you for the lovely compliment. I'm glad you enjoyed!
Great review as always Rob. Two comments though. No-one seems to be discussing the fact that yet again this season the Doctor has been involved in the death of a creature that was possibly the last of its kind. Surely this (as well as the crack) is part of the overall story arc this year.
Secondly, as someone who suffers with depression, its treatment of it was spot on. It's more than possible than Van Gogh could have seen his future success and felt a massive high but then had a major downer as well. Thats what depression feels like.
It was a really great episode, one of the first in the new series that i totally enjoyed. but what is annoying me is the song used at the end. it was amazing but cannot think of it!
@John, because I noticed your comment, I don't think the creature (whose species I can't recall, much less spell) was the last of its kind – the Doctor mentioned that its race is somewhat cruel and callous, and they travel in packs, and that if one gets injured or something, it gets left behind so that there are a bunch of places in the universe where there's one that's just… left.
Doesn't negate the possible thematic elements, but I think it was more just one that had been abandoned and left behind by its fellows rather than the actual last of its kind.
Thanks for the perspective on depression, John. Do have to say, though, that I agree with Beka as far as the creature. The Doctor felt a kinship with it because it was alone on this planet. They didn't say that it was alone in the universe but left behind.
A writer whose blog I read, Sam Starbuck (found on dreamwidth.org or livejournal.com as copperbadge) made a shortish post a little while ago about how the important thing about the episode was that Vincent van Gogh was crazy, and nobody could fix him. Sam's got clinical depression, so it really was an important point, to him.
I myself (not mentioned above because I was still rolling it over in my brain a bit) appreciated that fact SO much, having dear friends who are various shades of aneurotypical (autistic, depressed, agoraphobic, etc.), and myself being bipolar. We are crazy, and we cannot be fixed. Sometimes the crazy isn't bad – my autistic friends are amazingly talented storytellers, and one of them runs our online Dungeons and Dragons group – and sometimes the crazy is almost unbearable. But no matter how much therapy we get and medications we take, we won't be "better", just… less crazy.
In the end, we'll never know what prompted van Gogh to take his own life, in reality OR in the Whoniverse, but that doesn't matter so much as realising the truth that not everything can be fixed by knowing you're loved, by flowers and sunlight and long walks and hugs, by being told that it's all going to work out in the end. It doesn't mean you don't appreciate it all, but sometimes the dark places are too dark to bear. We should, I think, all make an effort to help our friends and family through those places to the other side, but when you try and do the best you can, and you lose them to the darkness anyway, it wasn't because you failed – it was because they were, like van Gogh, crazy, and no one could fix them.
(and for those who might object, yes, I use the term "crazy" despite its negative connotations, to tie everything together. Van Gogh was mad, crazy, whatever word you want to use, and so are so many of us.)
I just love reading your reviews Rob. I was watching this episode as it was aired here in the UK and at the back of my mind I wonder whether you would like it too. I suppose for those who would prefer a Doctor Who episode that's full on effects, villains and monsters but devoid of heart, this episode will not bode well, but I really think that the episodes of the new season just gets better and better. I have to say I was nearly gutted that there was still five minutes left and it didnt feel like there was not going to be any closure. not to mention I only saw Bill Nighy briefly, but it was the stroke of genius I suppose coming from Curtis to leave the best for last with such aplomb.
And I absolutely heart Tony Curran!
Another great episode, and another great review, Rob! I also have really enjoyed reading the discussion in the comments. It's hit upon something I saw in the episode but didn't quite realize: the theme of blindness, and not being able to see what Van Gogh sees (because he has a unique view on the world), is not being able to see what Van Gogh sees, because he has a mental disorder (depression).
I am very happy about how this episode handled the complex subject of art, vision, mental illness, and legacy. I don't want to get into a long discussion for fear I might say something really dumb by accident, but I just wanted to say – this episode will stand out for me along with the greats that I've seen: the Empty Child / Doctor Dances, Blink, and others.
Very well-delivered review, as ever, but I can't help but disagree: Curran's Van Gogh and his condition were reduced to a pile of histrionics; his Scottish-sounding accent, though no doubt a side-effect of the TARDIS' translation effect, became too much of a distraction (and really, a woman as inquisitive as Amy should have brought that up by now); and the museum scene showed the most over-indulgent sides of both Curtis and Murray Gold, as any sentiment was drowned in schmaltz. I was, however, very happy at the BBC's decision to put up a phone number for people who want help treating their depression.
Oh thank god.
I was terrified, honestly, to read any reviews of this episode because I know how some people think, and I know there will be many horrible reviews, from “it doesn’t make sense that he’d still kill himself” to “it makes no sense that he could see the creature when no one else could” to “it makes no sense he’d dedicate a painting just to Amy” and many more between. I’m going to be steering far FAR away from those reviews, because they’ll only upset me – this episode spoke profoundly to me, on many levels, and I really and truly loved what it had to say.
So thank you for understanding what sort of episode this is. :) It gives me hope for the universe to know SOME people can still grasp and enjoy art of any stripe that doesn’t fill in the blanks for you.
Curran’s Van Gogh and his condition were reduced to a pile of histrionics
That is a really odd thing to say, since I think the episode was at pains to underplay his condition. We really only have one scene that really shows the effects of his depression; the moment in his bedroom when he is crying. That was a simple and very effective and evocative scene, not a "pile of histrionics".
and the museum scene showed the most over-indulgent sides of both Curtis and Murray Gold, as any sentiment was drowned in schmaltz.
Schmaltz? Really? I wonder if you are easily embarrassed by displays of emotion, since you've criticised two deeply emotional moments in this episode. And – given his long history in romantic comedies – I wouldn't have been surprised by schmaltz in a Richard Curtis episode, but I really didn't see it here at all. Genuine emotion, yes. But not all sentiment and emotion = schmaltz.
Plus, you criticise composer Murray Gold. Isn't that entire scene scored with a song? A song not written by the series composer? I can be critical of Gold, but it's pretty clear he's not at fault in that scene. If indeed anyone is at fault for that sublime moment of television.
Given your other criticism (seriously? you're concerned about the TARDIS translator? are you kidding?), it's clear we watch WHO for completely different reasons. I feel sorry that you couldn't appreciate the emotional core of this episode.
Crossoverman,
Thank you for the correction re: the music in the museum scene. But I reject your insinuation.
@Art, while I can definitely appreciate your opinion on most of the episode, I’d disagree that Curran’s van Gogh was reduced to “a pile of histrionics”, if only because I myself have, during especially bad times, had reactions to the world that were nearly identical to his tearful breakdown in his room (which is the only moment I can think of in the episode that could be properly described as “histrionics”). I’m not saying it couldn’t have been done smaller and still believable, but when someone is, like the Doctor was, trying to say “oh, it’ll be okay, you’ll see, just come have a nice little stroll in the sunshine” or whatever, and you’re in the midst of a depressive fit that you KNOW won’t be fixed by a nice stroll in the sunshine and reassurances that it’ll be okay, the urge to flip out at the person saying that can be overwhelming.
…Rob, I apologise for commenting all over your review, apparently I’m having a mild case of “everyone must be at least mildly informed on the internet!” tonight.
I could just hug Crossoverman right now.
Also along the theme of ‘blindness’ was the moment that the Doctor accidentily called Van Gogh , Rory . With no real response from Amy or Van Gogh for that matter , the Doctor quickly corrected himself and moved on . Amy had no recollection of Rory and Van Gogh had never met him , both ‘blind’ to the Doctor’s mistake.
Once again i’ve enjoyed your review.
Great review Rob, I'm finally caught up on my Doctor Who – this episode is one of my favorites this season so far. I for one, as a son of a clinically depressed parent understand what that does and can do As far as the negative reviews saying he would not kill himself, to postulate that a person that suffers deep depression can be cured by seeing what his creations will become shows a deep naivete' towards the clinically depressed. His last year with his burst of creativity and then suicide is perfectly in line with what would happen. I loved the chemistry between Van Gough and Amy.
This episode brought me to tears. The beauty of it was staggering.